Ruling on Treaty between Belgium and Netherlands

Posted in Law, News, Taxation

Tax Information Exchange

A new ruling has been made regarding the Belgium-Netherlands Income and Capital Tax Treaty (2001). On 25 January 2018, the Supreme Court made a decision regarding a professional cyclist that was employed by two Belgian cycling teams during 2007-2009. This cyclist had many races outside of Belgium; in the Netherlands, Italy, Australia, France, Luxembourg, and Spain, and in the income tax return, he requested a proportional exemption of his salary based on the days of participation in cycling races and the applicable treaty provisions.

The argument brought to court was regarding the allocation key used by the taxpayer. The Courts of First Instance and Appeal ruled in favor of the taxpayer, agreeing that allocations based solely on the races performed are a suitable allocation key. The Belgian tax administration disagreed, stating that not only was this an unsuitable allocation key but that effective taxation in the Netherlands under article 23(1)(a)of the Treaty was required in order to be able to benefit from an exemption. Therefore, the Belgian tax administration filed an appeal before the Court of Cassation. Article 23(1)(a) of the Treaty states that Belgium will exempt income other than dividends, interest, or royalties or other items of capital which are taxed in the Netherlands from taxation but may still apply the tax rate which would have been applicable if such income or item were not exempt.

The Supreme Court and the Advocate General decided to reject the arguments of the Belgian tax administration citing that an allocation key based on the days of participation in cycling races is not contrary to the law. The Advocate General clarified that an argumentum a contrario is not allowed. In laymen’s terms, it is not allowed to reallocate the competence to tax on the basis of article 23(1)(a) of the Treaty. If Belgium wished to tax items of income, for which the competence to tax is allocated to the other contracting state, it should have included a credit system in the Treaty. This decision states that there is no room for a “subject-to-tax clause” under the exemption method.

Want to know more about our Taxation services, Read here

Global HR & Mobility Market Updates

The Latest News on Canadian Visa Program, US Election and Covid-19

– Canadian visa program may lure tech workers blocked by Trump
– A top immigrant advocate on the US election
– COVID-19: Dutch State Secretary Extends Reporting Deadlines

Read More

The Latest News on COVID-19, Skill Gaps and American Workers

– COVID-19 has surfaced these skill gaps: now we need to fill them
– Employees Look to HR to Evaluate COVID-19 Data Before Reopening
– Judge Rules U.S. Companies Can Be Sued for Preferring U.S. Workers

Read More

Lockdown and Tax

Nowadays, in the COVID-19 crisis, many of us live in Lockdown or something very similar. In any way, we are restricted in our travel. Many want to leave their homes but cannot.

Read More

We offer innovative, smart & sustainable solutions for any global mobility challenge, at transparent (value) pricing.

Browse our website and our portfolio of services,
see why EMG is your global mobility partner of choice.

Looking forward to providing a moving experience,
Nino Nelissen – Founder of EMG